?

Log in

No account? Create an account

Previous Entry | Next Entry

Responding to Math (Eww?):

Let me start off: Math? Eww!

Let me revise. Math teaching? Eww!

I had the fortune to not learn math the traditional way. I didn’t learn abstract problems. I’ve never done much formal algebra. I’m working on calculus now, because it’s interesting for what I’m learning.

But I didn’t learn formal algebra, the so-called prerequisite.

I learned trigonometry first.

At this point, I’d been programming computers for a fair number of years (I started at age 6, on my TI 99 -4a. And I started with text manipulation, because we had the speech synthesizer addition.) I had an idea what variables were. I had a good idea how to twist the symbols around programatically. I could do what one might consider algebra, on the computer. But I wasn’t thinking about balanced equations and transformations—that came later when I wrote a wiki, and I thought about it textually. I was trying to get things to add up right to make the game world the right size. I was trying to make pretty colors (16 Bit!). I learned binary arithmetic.

But then I had to learn trigonometry.

And there was a reason for this.

We were building a house. And we’re not talking 16-inch-center studs, slap two up around every doorway cookie-cutter house, we were Building A House. Out of big timbers and straw bales.

And it had to not fall down. There’s no book of The Way You Must Do This that’s pre-approved, no thought required. There’s a bunch of engineering books. Some of them quite accessible. We had to make a plan and get an engineer to approve it.

So we did. My dad and I learned trigonometry together. We paced around timber and computer models. We learned about force vectors. We learned how the triangular structure of the house would distribute the loads.

I wrote a few programs then to figure some parts out. If I’d had Ruby at the time, I’d have used Ruby. But I had Quattro. And AutoCAD. And we made it work.

I’d been programming for years before I did much more than counting, mathematically, with it. I learned math, not by being taught abstractions, but by having a real physical use for it.

Really, math is shapes and transformations and patterns and relationships. The way it’s taught is manipulations on abstract symbols and so wholly unapplied that it’s painful to watch.

Programming, the way I learned, however, was fun. I wrote a wiki. I wrote text tools. I chopped words up in all sorts of ways. I wrote madlib generators. Lists of words, lists of sentences, lists of paragraphs. Yes, you can count elements in a list. Yes, you can think of the elements as symbols in a set alphabet.

But when it comes down to it, programming words is fun. And math is better when applied, either manipulating graphics or lumber. Teaching it in the abstract is boring. Really, really boring.

Oh, and the house is still standing. And it doesn’t shake in the wind like the one we lived in before did.

Comments

( 13 comments — Leave a comment )
mathwhiz78
May. 3rd, 2007 10:25 pm (UTC)
Ooh, nifty! Got pics of the house?
gorillapotter
May. 3rd, 2007 10:59 pm (UTC)
I have to admit that I'm way more fascinated by the house than the math--but perhaps that's as it should be--maybe I'll learn the math too someday, for just that reason.
aredridel
May. 3rd, 2007 11:31 pm (UTC)
That's the thing.

Math is pretty shapes in abstract form.

Houses are pretty shapes you can touch and live in.
arvindn
May. 3rd, 2007 11:33 pm (UTC)
Wow. That's beautiful.
rising_dawn
May. 4th, 2007 12:18 am (UTC)
I was thinking of you today Aria... I was out finishing a deck on the stage and you appeared in my mind/heart. I love the math post- and I adore the house you helped to build.
jwitchbaby
May. 4th, 2007 03:55 am (UTC)
As always, Geek = Hott.

You unschooler you.
aredridel
May. 4th, 2007 04:36 am (UTC)
*grins*
tsunobrat
May. 4th, 2007 04:32 am (UTC)
It is not boring. It is beautiful. It is so amazing to have so much potential all in one spot. Math in the abstract can be anything, do anything... There's nothing else like it.
aredridel
May. 4th, 2007 04:36 am (UTC)
It is! It's why I get so upset when I see it being ruined, taught badly. It's that seeing that makes it so beautiful. From the little tautologies to the big, beautiful pictures and shapes, turned in on themselves or outward in curves and smooth lines.

kindredsgirl
May. 4th, 2007 03:48 pm (UTC)
I wish I had the math savvy to work with my boys like your dad did with you. . .

They certainly won't get that at school. . .

Laura
aredridel
May. 4th, 2007 03:49 pm (UTC)
The thing was, it wasn't math saavy. We both had to learn.

And we had a house to build. The mobile home permit was only good for two years.

But yeah. School isn't my favorite place.
(Anonymous)
May. 6th, 2007 06:54 pm (UTC)
Awesome.

I also learned programming before algebra. I've studied a ton of math in College, but I'm still longing to apply almost all of it - and the math I learned in Physics class, especially, has left my mind for lack of application and lack of completely grokking it in the first place. Despite that, I still got really "good grades." Sigh.
bikko
May. 6th, 2007 06:55 pm (UTC)
Whoops.
That was me.
( 13 comments — Leave a comment )