Log in

No account? Create an account

Previous Entry | Next Entry

Web 2.0

Does anyone know of a good definition of web 2.0 somewhere? It seems like one of those vague things...
Most of the sites that talk about it engage in far too much pretentious wankery for me to accept their definitions
The concepts are "users contribute content" and "content from different sites can be merged". Also, "gradient backgrounds make us look cool" "Javascript is neeto" and "Kittens! OMGLOL!"


( 7 comments — Leave a comment )
Jul. 3rd, 2007 07:15 pm (UTC)
I have nothing to say except LOL. And *grins*
Jul. 4th, 2007 12:47 am (UTC)
gah! Library 2.0 is even worse.
Jul. 4th, 2007 01:03 am (UTC)
Jul. 4th, 2007 02:07 am (UTC)
well, it's all talk and no one is being very clear about what it is, exactly, except that we should be doing it because it's dynamic and serves people better and gets the bun out of our hair.

See http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Library_2.0
Jul. 4th, 2007 05:44 am (UTC)
Library 2.0!?!? That makes me want to contribute my Fist 2.0 through their Face's API.
Jul. 4th, 2007 01:47 am (UTC)
The things I miss when I get called in to work on my day off...
Jul. 4th, 2007 05:42 am (UTC)
Next up, Web 3.0!
Where self-relevant wankers discusses and exhalts user generated and contributed gradient kitten backgrounds are merged over mobile phones to an iptv near you, ranked in relevance by folksonomy, and customizable through the positioning of the rfid implanted in your butt via javascript. Which will become atom-enabled. Your butt I mean, not the kittens.

(atom enabled butt?) brb, gotta go stream an update...
( 7 comments — Leave a comment )