Aria Stewart (aredridel) wrote,
Aria Stewart
aredridel

Socialism and Capitalism.

Thinking about socialism, I realized that my beliefs can be summed up easily: Socialism must be a social force. It can't be legislated without the full will of the people. Keeping that will afterward, too, means that it has to work in the best interests of that society, too, or it will fail.

A society is more likely to be in tune with its laws if the regions the laws govern are small. A country as vast as the United States is currently is legally top-heavy: It has many distinct regions with distinct cultures. No law fits all of them easily. What few pass the muster are little more than the Bill of Rights. Even within my state, there's enough regional difference to cause strife. The uneven population base leans money toward the majority's benefit, often to the detriment of those on the other side of the mountains, where the issues are different and none of the services the money has funded are available.

As a society, the US is amazingly rich. I think some socialism is the Right Thing, if only because things like malnutrition and most disease can be solved 100%. There's no reason for any member of our society to be excluded. We can bring the base-line up. I don't think all industry must be private — quite the opposite — but that human rights can be an ever increasing thing, not some ancient minimum that can never be altered.

Imagine if, today, in all grocery stores, the food were priced much as it is today. Except at the bottom of the shelves in the front are bags of beans, rice, oats ... maybe even flour. Basics. Free. Just take some — there's plenty, after all. It's not glamourous, but one need not die of starvation even if completely without money. There is no qualifying, no need for tracking, and it's basic enough and the value low enough that hoarding should be rare, and treated as the social disease it is, not as a high crime.

The ingenious may decide to save their cash and eat only basics. It may spur small-time industry and company start-ups, because one can always put food on the table while trying a new venture. Imagine being relatively poor, and saving the money your family spends on food. That goes a long way toward funding a new invention, a new business, or can just ease a financial tight spot. There would be no barrier to, tomorrow, simply not paying for food for a while while you get back on your feet, or found a way to be financially independent in the future. You won't get rich just by eating beans and rice, but you may become independent.

Other things, the things that naturally form monopolies, particularly utilities, make perfect things to socialise. Power plants have little room to compete, and given a free market, will tend to play winner-take-all. Phone and internet service I am somewhat dubious of being socialised, because a driving force to improve is needed. With the right attitude, it too could be socialised.

Subscribe

  • rpc.statd goes wild!

    I came in to work today to find my mac workstation spinning running rpc.statd at 100% CPU. A quick dtruss -n rpc.statc showed that it was looping…

  • Useful Javascript

    I just created a drop-down menu with an option to add your own entries. Feel free to use. The skinny. Demo.

  • (no subject)

    I just asked my OpenSRS/Tucows domain reseller rep about AAAA (IPv6) glue records: They are planning to support them soon! In the mean time, they…

  • Post a new comment

    Error

    Anonymous comments are disabled in this journal

    default userpic

    Your reply will be screened

    Your IP address will be recorded 

  • 6 comments